Dhurandhar: The Revenge
Hollywood has been making apology films for a decade. Every American action movie now comes loaded with a second-act speech about institutional corruption, military-industrial complex guilt, or the hero's own problematic violence. Bollywood, specifically Aditya Dhar, has decided not to bother.…
Full analysis belowNOT A WOKE TRAP. Dhurandhar: The Revenge is openly, aggressively, proudly nationalist Indian cinema from frame one. There is no hidden woke payload waiting in the second half. The film celebrates Indian intelligence operations, depicts Pakistan's terror networks as the enemy, and frames a Sikh man's transformation into a Muslim-identity spy as a sacrifice for the motherland. Liberal critics in India called it propaganda and Islamophobic. We call it a spy film. The margin is +26.74 TRAD with zero woke content detected. Woke trap requires a negative margin to qualify. This film is about as far from a woke trap as you can get.
Hollywood has been making apology films for a decade. Every American action movie now comes loaded with a second-act speech about institutional corruption, military-industrial complex guilt, or the hero's own problematic violence. Bollywood, specifically Aditya Dhar, has decided not to bother. Dhurandhar: The Revenge runs 229 minutes, the eighth longest Indian film ever made, and uses every single one of those minutes to assert one thesis: India has enemies, those enemies are real, and one man willing to sacrifice everything can make them pay.
That man is Jaskirat Singh Rangi, a Sikh from Pathankot whose backstory reads like the premise of a Greek tragedy. His father is hanged. His sisters are gang raped, one murdered, one abducted, by a corrupt local politician during a land dispute. Jaskirat arms himself, kills the men responsible, and ends up on death row. Then Indian intelligence comes calling. By 2004 he has become Hamza Ali Mazari, a Muslim identity built from scratch and deployed into Karachi's underworld to dismantle Pakistan's terror financing networks from the inside.
Ranveer Singh plays Hamza with complete physical and psychological commitment. This is not his usual Bollywood bombast, the cartoon energy that made him famous in films like Simmba and Gully Boy. Singh disappears into Hamza, and disappears is the right word. The character has no home, no authentic relationships, no real identity. His wife Yalina does not know who he is. His son Zayan will never know him. His friend Gurbaaz, who saved his sister after Jaskirat's arrest, ends up in Karachi working for the same criminal network Hamza is dismantling, and Hamza has to kill him to maintain cover. The scene is brutal. Singh plays it without a flinch.
The operational scope is enormous. Dhar weaves actual geopolitical events through the plot: Operation Lyari, the arrest of Uzair Baloch, IC 814 hijacker Zahoor Mistry, financier Javed Khanani, the poisoning of Dawood Ibrahim. These are not invented villains. They are real criminals from documented Indian intelligence history, fictionalized just enough to work as cinema. The effect is something between a spy thriller and a historical document. You finish the film knowing more about Pakistan's criminal ecosystem than you did going in.
The chapter structure (seven named sections including 'Lucifer,' 'Trial by Fire,' and 'The Revenge') helps the runtime breathe. This is not a film that feels 229 minutes long. Dhar cuts between timelines with precision and knows when to slow down and when to accelerate. The Lyari section is the film's political and moral center, with Hamza playing multiple factions against each other in a city that runs on ethnic loyalty and organized crime. The ISI confrontation in the second half escalates into something approaching grand opera: torture cells, political blackmail, a Pakistani general coerced into releasing Hamza by evidence of his dealings with Israeli intelligence.
Arjun Rampal as Major Iqbal is the film's best villain in years. He's based on Ilyas Kashmiri, the actual ISI-linked militant commander, and Rampal plays him as a man who has completely internalized the logic of holy war. When he stabs Hamza in the madrassa during their confrontation, he is not irrational. He is following his own code with perfect consistency. That Hamza survives the explosion and hunts Iqbal to a shipping yard, killing him in a kerosene tanker fire, is earned partly because Iqbal is genuinely formidable. R. Madhavan as intelligence director Ajay Sanyal is the moral authority of the Indian state, the man who sends Jaskirat into the dark and eventually brings him home.
The film's thesis is uncomfortable for people used to Western action cinema's self-flagellating mode. There is no scene where Hamza questions whether India is worth the sacrifice. There is no moment where an Indian politician is revealed as corrupt or complicit. The state is legitimately good. The enemy is legitimately evil. The violence Hamza commits, including killing his own friend and handler, is presented as tragic but necessary. Liberal Indian media has howled about propaganda and Islamophobia. From a VirtueVigil perspective: depicting documented Pakistani terrorist operations run by real named criminals is not Islamophobia. It is history.
The ending is quietly devastating. Jaskirat returns to India, is commended for his service, and then disappears before his formal debrief. He goes back to Pathankot and watches his family, including his surviving sister Jasleen, from a distance. He cannot reconnect. He has been Hamza Ali Mazari for too long. Jaskirat Singh Rangi no longer exists in any meaningful sense. The nation got what it needed. The man paid the full price.
Conservative and traditional viewers will find Dhurandhar: The Revenge a breath of fresh air that, at nearly four hours, turns into a full-body immersion. This is cinema that knows what it believes. It believes in the nation. It believes in masculine sacrifice. It believes that some enemies are real and that killing them is morally correct. It does not apologize for any of this, and neither should you for enjoying it.
Formula: Weighted Score = Severity × Authenticity Multiplier × Centrality Multiplier
🟢 Traditional Tropes
| Trope | Severity | Authenticity | Centrality | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Family Vengeance and Honor Defense | 5 | High | High | 6.3 |
| Masculine Lone Wolf Competence | 5 | High | High | 6.3 |
| Patriotic Nationalism as Sacred Duty | 5 | High | High | 6.3 |
| Intelligence and Military Service as Honorable Sacrifice | 4 | High | High | 5.04 |
| Righteous Violence Against Established Evil | 4 | High | Moderate | 2.8 |
| TOTAL TRADITIONAL | 26.7 | |||
Score Margin: +26.74 TRAD
Director: Aditya Dhar
CONSERVATIVE-LEANING. Dhar made Uri: The Surgical Strike (2019), which celebrated India's retaliatory cross-border strike on Pakistan after the 2016 Pulwama attack. Uri was one of the highest-grossing Bollywood films of its year and launched the modern era of unapologetic Indian nationalist cinema. Dhar also wrote and directed Dhurandhar (2025), the first part of this duology. His films consistently center the Indian state, its intelligence apparatus, and masculine sacrifice for national security as unambiguous goods. Indian liberal press has called his work 'sangh propaganda' and accused him of Islamophobia. From a VirtueVigil perspective, his filmography looks like what you'd get if a competent filmmaker made patriotic American military films in the 1980s, except in Hindi.Aditya Dhar began his career as an assistant director on Aashiqui 2 (2013) before writing and directing Uri: The Surgical Strike (2019), which became a cultural phenomenon in India and minted Vicky Kaushal as a major star. His signature is grounding action in real geopolitical events, weaving together genuine intelligence history with thriller plotting. For the Dhurandhar duology, he spent years researching Pakistan's criminal underworld, Operation Lyari, and RAW operations before writing the screenplay. He shot both parts simultaneously over a span beginning in July 2024. Dhurandhar: The Revenge runs 229 minutes, the eighth-longest Indian film ever made, suggesting Dhar is not a filmmaker who traffics in compromise.
Writer: Aditya Dhar, Ojas Gautam, Shivkumar V. Panicker
Dhar wrote the original story and primary screenplay, with Gautam and Panicker contributing additional screenplay work. Panicker also served as editor, suggesting deep creative integration between the writing and the cutting room. The screenplay is structured in seven named chapters, which functions as both a narrative device and a guide for what is essentially an epic historical thriller. The writing earns credit for weaving actual figures into the fiction: Dawood Ibrahim, Rehman Dakait, IC 814 hijacker Zahoor Mistry, financier Javed Khanani. These are real names, real crimes, real history. That anchoring in documented evil gives the film's righteous violence a weight that purely fictional spy thrillers often lack.
Adult Viewer Insight
If you have any passing knowledge of post-2001 South Asian geopolitics, Operation Lyari, the 26/11 Mumbai attacks, or the career of figures like Dawood Ibrahim, this film is going to hit differently than it does for a general American audience. It's playing with documented history in a way that is basically impossible for Hollywood to replicate, because Hollywood would spend half the runtime apologizing for having opinions. Dhar has no such reflex. The film assumes the audience knows who the bad guys are and skips the moral throat-clearing. At 229 minutes it is a commitment. Clear your evening. Get through the Lyari section (roughly the film's middle third) and the pacing question becomes irrelevant because you are in it. The torture sequence in the third chapter is genuinely hard to watch, not in a gratuitous way but in the way good thrillers make you feel the stakes. Ranveer Singh has never been better. The score by Shashwat Sachdev is excellent. The film is not on streaming as of this review, so 987 US theaters (mostly in Indian diaspora markets) are your venue of choice. Worth the trip.
Parental Guidance
Not rated by MPAA for US release. The film is a CBFC-certified Indian production. Content includes graphic violence, explicit references to gang rape and murder of the protagonist's sisters, torture sequences, and sustained action violence throughout a 229-minute runtime. Not appropriate for anyone under 16. Older teens and adults who enjoy serious spy thrillers can handle this, but go in knowing the backstory is dark and the film does not flinch.
Find Dhurandhar: The Revenge on Amazon Prime Video, rent, or buy:
▶ Stream or Buy on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate, VirtueVigil earns from qualifying purchases.
Community Discussion 0
Subscribe to comment.
Join the VirtueVigil community to share your perspective on this review.