The Flash
The Flash is a film that should not exist, barely does exist, and yet contains some of the best superhero filmmaking of 2023 embedded inside the most troubled production in DC history. That combination makes it one of the most difficult films to evaluate fairly.
Full analysis below
The Flash's dominant ideology is incoherence rather than progressive agenda. It is too distracted by its own multiverse spectacle and behind-the-scenes chaos to sustain a consistent ideological message. What progressive elements exist are visible and not hidden. The film fails commercially and critically as a narrative, not as a political trap.
Our Verdict on The Flash
The Flash is a film that should not exist, barely does exist, and yet contains some of the best superhero filmmaking of 2023 embedded inside the most troubled production in DC history. That combination makes it one of the most difficult films to evaluate fairly.
Director Andy Muschietti, working from a screenplay that went through over fifty drafts across eight directors, somehow assembled a film that is visually inventive, emotionally genuine in its first act, and spectacularly incoherent in its third. The multiverse premise, borrowed from the Flashpoint comic storyline, sees Barry Allen travel back in time to prevent his mother's murder, inadvertently creating an alternate timeline where the DC universe is completely different and General Zod's invasion (from Man of Steel) is now unstoppable without the absent Superman.
The casting of Ezra Miller as Barry Allen is the film's central and inescapable problem. Miller's off-screen behavior, which included multiple criminal incidents, made the film's release a corporate liability exercise rather than a genuine theatrical event. Warner Bros. ultimately kept the film rather than shelve a $220M investment. Whatever you think of that decision, it ensures that evaluating The Flash purely as a film requires a degree of intellectual separation that most audiences cannot perform and arguably should not be expected to perform.
On pure craft grounds: the first act is surprisingly good. Barry's grief over his mother's murder is rendered with genuine emotional weight. Michael Keaton's return as the 1989 Batman is the best part of the film by a significant margin. Keaton slides back into Bruce Wayne with zero effort, delivering lines about age and time that feel genuinely earned. The sequence where young Barry discovers his powers in the alternate timeline has a physical comedy lightness that recalls the best sequences from the original.
The second act collapses under the weight of its own ambitions. The alternate timeline's version of Barry (same actor, different personality) is the film's biggest miscalculation. Muschietti attempts to use the duplicate to show Barry what he would have been without grief, but the character read as irritating rather than illuminating. Two Ezra Millers onscreen simultaneously, given Miller's real-world circumstances, is an uncomfortable experience regardless of the film's intent.
The third act is where the wheels fully come off. The multiverse resolution involves CGI cameos of past DC heroes so uncanny-valley that they look like unfinished video game assets. The logic of what Barry can and cannot change is never properly established, making the emotional stakes collapse. The film ends on a note of resignation about the unfixability of loss that is more existentially bleak than most superhero films attempt.
For conservative audiences, The Flash's values content is genuinely mixed. The film's central theme, that you cannot change the past and must make peace with loss, is a conservative argument against the progressive fantasy of endless revisability. Barry's arc is about accepting that his mother is gone and that his father's innocence can be restored without undoing her death. That is grief work, not revolution.
But the film also arrives with Ezra Miller as its lead, an actor whose off-screen behavior represents a comprehensive rejection of the values VirtueVigil cares about. The decision to proceed with the film rather than recast or shelve it was purely financial. That is worth naming.
The Flash is not a film with a coherent ideology. It is a film that had one, then had it scrambled by production chaos, executive turnover, lead actor crises, and the structural demands of franchise continuity. What survived is fragmentary and inconsistent. The verdict is MIXED because the film earns neither a traditional nor a progressive classification. It earns bewilderment.
Woke Tropes & Content Analysis
Formula: Weighted Score = Severity × Authenticity Multiplier × Centrality Multiplier
🔴 Woke Tropes
| Trope | Severity | Authenticity | Centrality | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lead Actor's Real-World Ideology (Ezra Miller) | 4 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| Institutional Collapse and Authority as Absence | 3 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Multiverse as Infinite Revisability (Progressive Fantasy) | 2 | 1 | 0.7 | 1.4 |
| Corporate Reputation Management Over Artist Accountability | 2 | 1 | 0.7 | 1.4 |
| TOTAL WOKE | 9.8 | |||
🟢 Traditional Tropes
| Trope | Severity | Authenticity | Centrality | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acceptance of Loss and the Limits of Control | 4 | 0.7 | 1.5 | 4.2 |
| Father Vindication as Sacred Motivation | 4 | 0.7 | 1 | 2.8 |
| Mentor Respect and Earned Wisdom (Keaton's Batman) | 4 | 0.7 | 1 | 2.8 |
| Sacrifice for Others as Ultimate Heroism | 3 | 0.7 | 0.8 | 1.68 |
| TOTAL TRADITIONAL | 11.5 | |||
Score Margin: +1.7 TRAD
Director: Andy Muschietti
CENTRIST. The Argentinian filmmaker behind the It adaptation (2017) and It Chapter Two (2019). Muschietti is a craft-focused director who prioritizes emotional stakes in horror and genre filmmaking. He has not made political statements as part of his public persona. His challenge on The Flash was inheriting a production that had already cycled through multiple directors and a lead actor in legal crisis.Andy Muschietti became one of Hollywood's most sought-after genre directors after It (2017) grossed over $700M worldwide. Warner Bros. brought him onto The Flash after multiple director departures. His instinct to prioritize character grief over spectacle produced the film's best sequences but could not compensate for the structural problems inherited from years of development chaos. He is attached to the Batman: The Brave and the Bold project as of this writing.
Content Breakdown
Adult Viewer Insight
Conservative adults face a real dilemma with The Flash: the film itself has some genuinely good content, particularly Keaton's Batman and the first-act grief narrative, but the lead actor's real-world conduct represents a pattern of behavior that many families find disqualifying. Warner Bros. proceeded with this film purely for financial reasons after Miller's criminal incidents. That is worth weighing against whatever entertainment value the film delivers. The multiverse premise, taken seriously, leads to philosophically conservative conclusions: you cannot rewrite the past, loss is real, and the fantasy of revision is dangerous. The film makes this argument accidentally but makes it nonetheless.
Parental Guidance
PG-13. Suitable for ages 13 and up, somewhat older than typical PG-13 fare. The action violence is intense, particularly in the Zod invasion sequences. One character death is emotionally affecting. Some humor is crude. A prison sequence is tense. The film's real-world lead actor context requires a parent-child conversation that most PG-13 films do not. Conservative families should consider whether the Ezra Miller circumstances disqualify the film as family viewing; this is a legitimate concern that goes beyond the film's content ratings.
Is The Flash Safe for Kids?
The Flash contains moderate language with occasional uses of mild profanity scattered throughout, though nothing constitutes strong or repeated vulgar language. Sexual content is minimal, limited to brief kissing scenes and no nudity or sexual situations of concern. Violence is present but typical for a superhero film. Action sequences include fighting, explosions, and property destruction rendered in a fantastical context. A significant character death occurs but is handled with emotional weight rather than graphic depiction. There is no gore or blood shown in detail. The film features intense sci-fi action that could startle younger viewers during climactic sequences. Alcohol and drug use are not depicted as positive lifestyle choices, appearing only in background or incidental contexts. No substance abuse is glorified or encouraged. Spiritual content is minimal. There are no overt religious references, positive or negative. The film operates within a secular superhero framework without commentary on faith or spirituality. The film's core themes involve sacrifice, family relationships, and redemption, presented in ways accessible to family audiences. The dialogue is generally clean, and situations avoid exploitation. Recommended for ages 12 and older. While the action intensity and emotional themes involving character death warrant parental consideration, the film avoids the profanity, sexual content, and graphic violence that would restrict younger viewers. Parents of sensitive children should preview the climactic sequences first.
Find The Flash on Amazon Prime Video, rent, or buy:
▶ Stream or Buy on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate, VirtueVigil earns from qualifying purchases.
Community Discussion 0
Subscribe to comment.
Join the VirtueVigil community to share your perspective on this review.